It's that time of year again. Less than a week to catch one's breath after the World Cup and the IPL is already kicking off. This time around I find myself with a dilemma over whom to support. Over the past three seasons, I've become a pretty serious Chennai Super Kings fan. Despite the major reshuffles elsewhere, CSK have kept the vast majority of their squad together, so it's likely I'll be rooting for them. However, one of the few players they did lose was Murali, who is now going to be playing in a team captained by fellow Sri Lankan Mahela Jayawardene. I'll have to wait and see which way my heartstrings tug me when the two sides face off, but in today's opener, there's no question whom I'll be cheering on. Come on the Super Kings.
Friday, 8 April 2011
Monday, 4 April 2011
An appalling, abysmal day for cricket
The ICC's decision today to reduce the 2015 World Cup to a 10-team tournament - excluding all associate nations - is nothing short of appalling. There have been a lot of good articles and blog posts written about this by people whose opinions are identical to mine. One I'd recommend is this post by Jarrod Kimber. I'm certainly going to do as he suggests and email enquiry@icc-cricket.com to enquire "why they thought it was a good idea to take the world out of the world cup."
Sunday, 3 April 2011
Some thoughts on the World Cup final
Yesterday's result was pretty disappointing for me, but I still managed to enjoy watching what was probably the best World Cup final since 1992. I like a lot of the Indian players and was happy that Sachin finally got to pick up a winner's medal - and do so in front of a Mumbai crowd. India were the better team both on the day and across the tournament as a whole. Their superb batting line-up was the main reason for their success but importantly they also stepped up the discipline levels of their bowling and fielding in the knockout stages.
As for exactly where the game was won, the thing that really stood out for me was the contrast between the way Gautam Gambhir batted after the fall of Sehwag and Sachin's wickets and Sri Lanka's approach in the first 15-20 overs of their own innings. On the biggest cricketing stage of all, Gambhir had the guts to keep attacking despite the early setbacks. He didn't blaze away wildly but did take take calculated risks, advancing down the wicket and hitting over the infield frequently enough to keep India up with the required run rate. That Gambhir had the confidence to do this was partly down to the fact that he knew his side had plenty of batting to come. Sri Lanka, on the other hand, seemed all too aware that in Angelo Mathews' absence, their tail was rather long and had to be shielded. While there was clearly a need for caution, I can't help thinking that Tharanga and Dilshan could have been more positive in their approach at the start.
There's been a lot of criticism of Sri Lanka's team selection by Sky and BBC pundits, which I think is largely unfounded. It seems likely to me that most of these pundits are (understandably) unfamiliar with the ins and outs of the 33 ODIs Sri Lanka had played against India between January 2008 and yesterday's final. While I might still have preferred to see Ajantha Mendis in the side, including Suraj Randiv was a perfectly rational move, given both his recent record against India and the difference between the playing conditions in Colombo and Mumbai. The slowish pitch and massive boundaries at the Premadasa Stadium were tailor-made for Mendis and Herath to choke opposition sides, while the truer batting surface and smaller ground at Wankhede would have rendered them less effective. Randiv, a taller spinner who generates more bounce, was a reasonable bet.
As for exactly where the game was won, the thing that really stood out for me was the contrast between the way Gautam Gambhir batted after the fall of Sehwag and Sachin's wickets and Sri Lanka's approach in the first 15-20 overs of their own innings. On the biggest cricketing stage of all, Gambhir had the guts to keep attacking despite the early setbacks. He didn't blaze away wildly but did take take calculated risks, advancing down the wicket and hitting over the infield frequently enough to keep India up with the required run rate. That Gambhir had the confidence to do this was partly down to the fact that he knew his side had plenty of batting to come. Sri Lanka, on the other hand, seemed all too aware that in Angelo Mathews' absence, their tail was rather long and had to be shielded. While there was clearly a need for caution, I can't help thinking that Tharanga and Dilshan could have been more positive in their approach at the start.
There's been a lot of criticism of Sri Lanka's team selection by Sky and BBC pundits, which I think is largely unfounded. It seems likely to me that most of these pundits are (understandably) unfamiliar with the ins and outs of the 33 ODIs Sri Lanka had played against India between January 2008 and yesterday's final. While I might still have preferred to see Ajantha Mendis in the side, including Suraj Randiv was a perfectly rational move, given both his recent record against India and the difference between the playing conditions in Colombo and Mumbai. The slowish pitch and massive boundaries at the Premadasa Stadium were tailor-made for Mendis and Herath to choke opposition sides, while the truer batting surface and smaller ground at Wankhede would have rendered them less effective. Randiv, a taller spinner who generates more bounce, was a reasonable bet.
Sunday, 27 March 2011
Adil Rashid gets a phone call from Geoff Miller and Andy Flower
Hello Adil - Geoff Miller and Andy Flower here. How are you...?
What's that? You just bowled the Lions to a win? That's lovely. Forgot that's why you're over in the Caribbean. Have you had a nice winter...?
Played a bit of T20 for South Australia in the Big Bash, did you? Very nice. Get on okay...?
Won the tournament? Smashing. Suppose you picked up a few wickets here and there...?
Lots? That's good to hear....
No, we didn't realise you'd started bowling an off-break as another variation to go with your googly and your slider...
No, we didn't know you'd gotten comfortable with taking the new ball...
No, to be honest we were just pretty busy winning the Ashes. Sorry about that.
So here's a proposition for you, Adil. How would you like to fly 9000 miles to join us in Sri Lanka...?
No, not to play in the quarter-final exactly. We were thinking more that you could sit in the dressing room like you did on all your previous tours. You remember, don't you? If we make it to the semi then maybe we'd ask you to carry some drinks, but even if we don't you'd be able to join the team for the flight back to England, which will be a laugh.
What do you say, Adil...?
What's that? You just bowled the Lions to a win? That's lovely. Forgot that's why you're over in the Caribbean. Have you had a nice winter...?
Played a bit of T20 for South Australia in the Big Bash, did you? Very nice. Get on okay...?
Won the tournament? Smashing. Suppose you picked up a few wickets here and there...?
Lots? That's good to hear....
No, we didn't realise you'd started bowling an off-break as another variation to go with your googly and your slider...
No, we didn't know you'd gotten comfortable with taking the new ball...
No, to be honest we were just pretty busy winning the Ashes. Sorry about that.
So here's a proposition for you, Adil. How would you like to fly 9000 miles to join us in Sri Lanka...?
No, not to play in the quarter-final exactly. We were thinking more that you could sit in the dressing room like you did on all your previous tours. You remember, don't you? If we make it to the semi then maybe we'd ask you to carry some drinks, but even if we don't you'd be able to join the team for the flight back to England, which will be a laugh.
What do you say, Adil...?
Wednesday, 23 March 2011
Quarter final team previews
West Indies
Roach, Sammy, Benn, Russell, Rampaul and Bishoo have produced a number of good bowling performances. A Gayle or Pollard onslaught is just the sort of thing that could cause the wheels could come off for Pakistan in the field, but my guess is that Afridi, Gul and co will stop that happening.
Pakistan
Anyone else noticed that Shahid Afridi often stands with his arms crossed when being interviewed at post-match ceremonies? Is this in a vain attempt to look serious? That said, while his batting is crazy, his bowling really is pretty serious, and Pakistan are pretty serious contenders. They've cruised quietly to the top of their group and now have a very winnable quarter ahead of them. I don't know why people didn't take more note of them earlier. Be Afridi. Be very Afridi.
India
Batting-wise, the top order's in top nick, but the middle order men can't middle it. Here's what Zaheer Khan had to say yesterday about the bowling: "As a bowling unit, I think I am doing well." You have to say that's a pretty entertaining Freudian slap in the face for Harbhajan, Sreesanth and co.
Anyone else noticed that Shahid Afridi often stands with his arms crossed when being interviewed at post-match ceremonies? Is this in a vain attempt to look serious? That said, while his batting is crazy, his bowling really is pretty serious, and Pakistan are pretty serious contenders. They've cruised quietly to the top of their group and now have a very winnable quarter ahead of them. I don't know why people didn't take more note of them earlier. Be Afridi. Be very Afridi.
India
Batting-wise, the top order's in top nick, but the middle order men can't middle it. Here's what Zaheer Khan had to say yesterday about the bowling: "As a bowling unit, I think I am doing well." You have to say that's a pretty entertaining Freudian slap in the face for Harbhajan, Sreesanth and co.
Australia
Likely to be presented with a juicy greentop in Ahmedabad, tailor-made for their speedsters. Not. Crumbled against Indian spinners in a warm-up game in Bangalore. If Harbhajan remembers how to take wickets, I'd expect a repeat. But beware Mike Hussey. I repeat: beware Mike Hussey.
Sunday, 20 March 2011
Sunday, 13 March 2011
Sachin, Sri Lanka, Sambit, painkillers and the choke'o'meter
The World Cup is in full swing and I have to say I'm loving it. Arguments about the format and the involvement of associate nations will rage on and on, but for me, this is still the most important tournament in the cricketing calendar and the current edition has already produced plenty of drama and excitement.
In addition to the on-field action, I've also enjoyed the accompanying feast of cricket writing. Here are some snippets of my favourite pieces from the last week or so, along with links to the full articles.
Mike Marqusee - The "symbolical" cricketer: Sachin Tendulkar
99 down, one to go. It seems only a matter of time before Sachin Tendulkar becomes the first man to score a ton of international tons, and it would be fitting if he reached the milestone in a World Cup match on home soil. The tribute pieces will come flooding in, but few will be as thought-provoking as Mike Marqusee's recent take on Sachin's unique status as a "symbolical" cricketer.
In addition to the on-field action, I've also enjoyed the accompanying feast of cricket writing. Here are some snippets of my favourite pieces from the last week or so, along with links to the full articles.
Mike Marqusee - The "symbolical" cricketer: Sachin Tendulkar
99 down, one to go. It seems only a matter of time before Sachin Tendulkar becomes the first man to score a ton of international tons, and it would be fitting if he reached the milestone in a World Cup match on home soil. The tribute pieces will come flooding in, but few will be as thought-provoking as Mike Marqusee's recent take on Sachin's unique status as a "symbolical" cricketer.
"Tendulkar’s personal achievements were represented as a triumph for India as a whole, a sign of the country advancing on the world stage – like Indian corporations opening plants in Europe or the USA. Unwittingly and unwillingly, he found himself at the epicentre of a popular culture shaped by the intertwined growth of a consumerist middle class and an assertive, sometimes aggressive form of national identity. National aspirations and national frustrations were poured into his every performance, and this during a period in which the nation passed through some very dark moments (Kashmir since 1989, Ayodhya in 1992, Mumbai in 1993, Gujarat in 2002, Mumbai in 2009). How he’s not been crushed by it all remains at least in part a mystery."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
